I love the fact that serious consideration about luxury beliefs is starting to coalesce, Henderson defined and named a phenomenon I've been seeing but hadn't been able to put a label on. I find your text:
The affluent have largely abandoned trickle-down economics in favor of trickle-down culture whereby they pluck talented people from ‘ma…
I love the fact that serious consideration about luxury beliefs is starting to coalesce, Henderson defined and named a phenomenon I've been seeing but hadn't been able to put a label on. I find your text:
The affluent have largely abandoned trickle-down economics in favor of trickle-down culture whereby they pluck talented people from ‘marginalized’ backgrounds based on race and gender to join their ranks, and their harmful beliefs about family, crime, substances, and everything that provides structure to life trickle down to the lower classes.
Just read another interview with RH where he accurately observes that the new definition of equality being implemented is making the 1% perfectly demographically representative of the substrate community rather levelling the field for all.
I've seen a backlash against the concept as well, with people thinking it's overused. I'm not sure that's yet the case. The diversification of the elite is something I've seen happen over the past ten or so years but it's not been a net good. It's actually just meant that the people of color who end up in their ranks bolster their ideology because it's a class project, above all, which is what I'm trying to emphasize in my work overall. I appreciate that the concept of trickle down culture made sense to you. And thanks for reading!
I love the fact that serious consideration about luxury beliefs is starting to coalesce, Henderson defined and named a phenomenon I've been seeing but hadn't been able to put a label on. I find your text:
The affluent have largely abandoned trickle-down economics in favor of trickle-down culture whereby they pluck talented people from ‘marginalized’ backgrounds based on race and gender to join their ranks, and their harmful beliefs about family, crime, substances, and everything that provides structure to life trickle down to the lower classes.
Just read another interview with RH where he accurately observes that the new definition of equality being implemented is making the 1% perfectly demographically representative of the substrate community rather levelling the field for all.
I've seen a backlash against the concept as well, with people thinking it's overused. I'm not sure that's yet the case. The diversification of the elite is something I've seen happen over the past ten or so years but it's not been a net good. It's actually just meant that the people of color who end up in their ranks bolster their ideology because it's a class project, above all, which is what I'm trying to emphasize in my work overall. I appreciate that the concept of trickle down culture made sense to you. And thanks for reading!